Share Article

Traditional Owner to challenge Murray River floodplain project
June 25, 2026
A Wadi Wadi Traditional Owner has launched legal action to challenge the Victorian government’s approval of a floodplain engineering project at Nyah on the Murray River.
Works associated with the project are understood to be imminent and, if they proceed, will harm culturally significant sites and landscapes, including waterways, camping grounds, ancestral burial sites, shell middens, earthen ovens, scar trees, and fish traps.
Traditional Owner Vince Kirby, represented by public interest lawyers at Environmental Justice Australia, will argue that the approval process failed to properly identify, assess and protect Aboriginal cultural heritage and did not involve adequate consultation with Traditional Owners before the plan was approved.
“The mighty Murray River is my lifeline. That water runs through my veins. It keeps me alive. All the wetlands and creeks keep us alive and keep all our animals, and birds alive. It is the source of our well-being,” Mr Kirby said.

Traditional Owner Vince Kirby has launched legal action.
“The Murray River is our source of life. It and all the billabongs that come off the river provide all our food and all that sustains us.
“We’ve looked after these rivers and wetlands forever. My grandmother grew up here and now I take my great grandchildren there. We have always camped out at Nyah. It was where we went to be on Country and enjoy our connection to Country.
“I don’t want to take my grandkids to my beautiful rivers and the places we used to camp and have to explain why there is a giant concrete regulator in their river.
“The whole process for approving these projects has shown no respect for my people. They can’t do this project without creating harm to the wetlands, the fish, the wildlife, and the heritage of the Wadi Wadi people.”
“The whole process for approving these projects has shown no respect for my people. They can’t do this project without creating harm to the wetlands, the fish, the wildlife, and the heritage of the Wadi Wadi people.”

Mr Kirby is seeking to challenge the approval of the Management Plan for cultural heritage at the site, as he says it allows activities which risk permanent harm to culturally significant sites and ancestral remains on Country. He will also argue that the approval process breached requirements under the Aboriginal Heritage Act and failed to properly consider rights protected by human rights legislation.
The project is part of a broader Murray-Darling Basin “water offset” scheme that would use levees, pumps and regulators to divert water to select floodplains, rather than restoring natural river flows.
Environmental Justice Australia Lawyer Elke Nicholson said the Nyah floodplain was rich in ancient and living cultural heritage and deserves protection.

“Instead, the government has authorised a construction project that will create permanent and irreversible harm to these places,” Nicholson said.
“For a project like this, the government is required to properly consult Traditional Owners. Instead, our client says the consultation was cursory and treated his cultural heritage as something that did not meaningfully involve him.
“This case is about our client’s human rights and his distinct cultural rights as an Aboriginal person to maintain his spiritual relationship to the land and waters of Nyah and to pass on traditional cultural practices to future generations.
“Our client is also seeking to hold government to account to properly assess and protect Aboriginal cultural heritage and to genuinely consult with those for whom it matters most – the Traditional Owners of the site – in this case the Wadi Wadi people of the Murray floodplains.”
Case Background:
-
The case challenges the Victorian Government’s approval of a Cultural Heritage Management Plan (CHMP) for the Nyah artificial floodplain engineering project.
-
The broader project is part of the Victorian Murray Floodplain Restoration Project and aims to avoid the recovery of environmental water by artificially inundating selected floodplains.
-
Vince Kirby argues the approval process did not properly assess risks of harm to Aboriginal cultural heritage, including ancestral remains. The legal challenge also raises concerns about:
-
inadequate consultation with Traditional Owners
-
breaches of Mr Kirby’s human rights as a Wadi Wadi person and alleged failures to consider relevant rights under Victoria’s Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities
-
alleged failures to properly assess cultural heritage as a living and ongoing practice that is much broader than a mere list of archaeological sites.
-
In areas without a Registered Aboriginal Party (RAP), the Victorian Government is responsible for approving Cultural Heritage Management Plans, so in this case, the approval was made by the Department of Premier and Cabinet.
-
Traditional Owners were given only a brief consultation window of 14 days to respond during the consultation process.
Related Posts
Categories






